Tokenized money market funds moved from concept to the largest institutional blockchain product category in under two years. By early 2026, combined assets across tokenized treasury and money market products exceeded ten billion dollars. BlackRock’s BUIDL alone holds over 1.8 billion dollars in assets. JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, BNY Mellon, Franklin Templeton, Circle, Fidelity, Ondo Finance, multiple other major institutions all run live products in the category.
This article explains what tokenized money market funds are, how they work under the hood, which infrastructure they depend on, why they have become the first large-scale institutional blockchain category. It is written by an infrastructure operator that runs oracle networks used by tokenized fund products in production.
Matrixed.Link is the first Node Operator to build the first major RWA integration with over 100 million dollars in total value locked. We bring operational experience from that work to how we describe the category.
1. What Is a Tokenized Money Market Fund?
A tokenized money market fund (TMMF) is a regulated money market fund whose shares are issued as digital tokens on a blockchain instead of (or in addition to) traditional fund share registration. The underlying fund holds the same assets as a traditional money market fund: short-duration US Treasury bills, commercial paper, repurchase agreements, cash equivalents. The tokenization layer changes how ownership is recorded and transferred, not what the fund actually holds.
Investors hold tokens in standard blockchain wallets. Each token represents a proportional claim on the fund’s underlying portfolio. The net asset value per token is typically published on-chain through an oracle feed. When the fund pays yield, the token value reflects that yield either through a growing token price or through regular distributions to token holders.
TMMFs sit inside the same regulatory perimeter as traditional money market funds. They are subject to the same rules about eligible holdings, weighted average maturity, liquidity requirements, investor disclosures. The tokenization does not change the regulatory category. It changes the operational mechanics.
The Difference Between TMMFs and Stablecoins
TMMFs and stablecoins both exist as blockchain tokens representing claims on off-chain assets. The difference is what they represent and how they are regulated.
Stablecoins represent claims on reserves designed to maintain a stable peg, typically to the US dollar. They are transactional instruments. Most stablecoins do not pay yield to holders.
TMMFs represent regulated fund shares. They pay yield from the fund’s portfolio holdings. Their value reflects the performance of the underlying fund, which is typically stable but can vary in exceptional circumstances.
Some products blur the line. Circle’s USYC functions as both a yield-bearing tokenized money market fund and as a programmable collateral asset. The category boundaries are less rigid than they once were.
The Difference Between TMMFs and Tokenized Treasury Funds
Tokenized money market funds and tokenized US Treasury funds are often used interchangeably. There is a technical distinction. Money market funds can hold a broader portfolio (commercial paper, bank deposits, repos) beyond Treasury securities. Tokenized US Treasury funds hold Treasury securities exclusively.
In practice, the tokenized variants tend to hold simpler, Treasury-heavy portfolios regardless of whether they are formally classified as MMFs or Treasury funds. The regulatory classification matters more than the operational reality.
2. How Tokenized Money Market Funds Actually Work
The mechanics of a TMMF involve several layers of infrastructure working together. Understanding the layers helps explain why infrastructure quality matters so much for these products.
The Traditional Fund Layer
Under the tokens sits a traditional fund structure. The fund is registered with applicable regulators (SEC in the US, similar authorities in other jurisdictions). It has a board, a fund administrator, a custodian for the underlying assets, a transfer agent for share registration, auditors, legal counsel, all the other infrastructure of a regulated fund.
The assets themselves (Treasury bills, commercial paper, repos, cash) are held in traditional custody at a qualified custodian bank. They do not exist on the blockchain. The tokens represent claims against these traditionally-held assets.
The Smart Contract Layer
The tokens are issued by smart contracts deployed on a blockchain. Most institutional TMMFs use compliance-enabled token standards that restrict transfers to whitelisted wallets. Transfers between non-approved addresses fail at the contract level. The contracts also handle yield distribution mechanics, administrative functions (pausing, upgrading), integration with external systems.
The specific blockchain varies by product. BlackRock BUIDL launched on Ethereum. Franklin Templeton FOBXX is available on multiple networks. JPMorgan’s tokenized money market fund runs on Ethereum. Circle’s USYC is available across several networks.
The Oracle Layer
Oracle infrastructure publishes off-chain data to the smart contracts. For a TMMF, the most important oracle feed is the fund’s net asset value per share. The NAV is calculated off-chain by the fund administrator using the same methodologies as a traditional fund. The oracle takes that NAV, attests to it cryptographically, publishes it to the blockchain on a regular schedule.
Without reliable NAV oracle infrastructure, the product cannot function. Investors would not know what each token is worth. Subscriptions and redemptions would have no pricing basis. Secondary trading would have no reference.
Other oracle feeds provide complementary data: proof of reserve attestations confirming that the off-chain assets actually exist, interest rate and yield metadata, administrative signals.
The Identity and Compliance Layer
TMMFs that serve regulated investors require identity verification. Investors must complete KYC checks before receiving tokens. The smart contracts enforce transfer restrictions based on investor status.
This layer typically includes third-party identity providers, transfer agent integration, on-chain compliance tooling. For products that serve multiple jurisdictions, the compliance layer must handle different rules for different investor types.
The Settlement Layer
When investors buy or sell TMMF shares, the settlement happens through the smart contracts. Primary issuance creates new tokens and transfers fiat to the fund administrator. Redemption burns tokens and transfers fiat back to the investor. Secondary transfers between approved holders move tokens directly.
Some TMMFs also integrate with external protocols. Composability with DeFi lending markets, collateral systems, other on-chain applications creates utility that traditional money market funds do not have.
The Custody Layer
Investors hold TMMF tokens in blockchain wallets. Institutional investors typically use qualified digital asset custodians (Anchorage, Fireblocks, BitGo, Coinbase Custody, Komainu, Copper) rather than self-custody. Smaller investors may self-custody or use wallet services provided by their TMMF issuer.
The custody layer has its own security, operational, regulatory requirements. For institutional investors, the combination of custody provider and issuer determines the total risk profile.
3. The Largest Tokenized Money Market Funds
The following are the most significant TMMF products as of early 2026. The category is growing rapidly, so this snapshot will date.
BlackRock BUIDL
USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund. Launched on Ethereum in March 2024 in partnership with Securitize as tokenization provider. Assets under management exceeded 1.8 billion dollars as of early 2026, making BUIDL the largest TMMF by AUM.
BUIDL holds cash, US Treasury bills, repurchase agreements. Yields are distributed to token holders through daily accruals. The fund serves qualified institutional investors and is available across multiple blockchain networks through cross-chain expansion.
BUIDL established the architectural template that most subsequent institutional TMMFs follow.
Franklin Templeton FOBXX
Franklin OnChain US Government Money Fund. One of the earliest tokenized money market funds from a traditional asset manager, launched on Stellar and later expanded to Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, Avalanche, other networks. FOBXX uses blockchain as a record of ownership for fund shares that are also available through traditional channels.
The fund’s innovation was the multi-chain expansion strategy, which has become the standard for TMMFs seeking broad distribution.
JPMorgan Tokenized Money Market Fund
JPMorgan Asset Management launched a tokenized money market fund on Ethereum in 2025. The product brings JPMorgan’s institutional money market fund distribution onto public blockchain infrastructure, complementing the bank’s private blockchain activities on the Kinexys network.
Goldman Sachs and BNY Mellon TMMF Solution
In July 2025, Goldman Sachs and BNY Mellon announced a joint tokenized money market fund solution. BNY uses blockchain technology developed by Goldman Sachs to maintain records of customer ownership of select money market funds from major managers.
The partnership represents a distinct architectural pattern: rather than each asset manager tokenizing its own funds independently, infrastructure partners (Goldman for technology, BNY for custody) provide a shared platform that multiple asset managers can use.
Circle USYC
USYC (USD Yield Coin) functions as both a tokenized money market fund and a yield-bearing collateral asset. Circle positions USYC as institutional-grade collateral that generates yield from a Treasury-backed portfolio while retaining the operational properties of a token.
USYC differs from BUIDL and FOBXX in its collateral-focused positioning. The underlying structure is similar (fund holdings backing on-chain tokens), but the product messaging targets treasury management and collateral use cases rather than pure fund investment.
Ondo Finance OUSG and USDY
Ondo Finance operates OUSG (Ondo Short-Term US Government Bond Fund) and USDY (USD Yield) as tokenized Treasury products targeting accredited and institutional investors. Ondo is crypto-native but serves mainstream institutional allocators.
Ondo Global Markets extends the category into tokenized equities, with the same operational playbook applied to equity products.
WisdomTree WTGXX
WisdomTree’s WTGXX received an SEC exemption in early 2026 allowing it to be traded by authorized broker-dealers. This regulatory development matters because it signaled that US securities regulators were prepared to accommodate tokenized fund structures with specific operational accommodations.
Fidelity Digital Tokenization Programs
Fidelity has expanded its tokenization activity to include tokenized money market products and related digital asset offerings. Fidelity Digital Assets Trust Company serves as custodian for multiple institutional digital asset programs.
Mountain Protocol USDM
USDM is a tokenized money market fund targeted at non-US investors. The product occupies the space that BUIDL-style funds occupy for US institutional investors, applied to jurisdictions where BUIDL and similar products face restrictions.
Superstate USTB
Superstate offers tokenized US Treasury funds and related products. The firm has focused on structured, regulated tokenized vehicles that serve the same institutional treasury management use case as larger-brand competitors.
4. Infrastructure Behind Tokenized MMFs
The infrastructure layer behind tokenized money market funds is where the products actually succeed or fail. Well-designed infrastructure keeps products running smoothly. Poorly-designed infrastructure creates outages, mispricing, reputational risk.
Oracle Infrastructure
NAV oracles are the single most critical infrastructure component for a TMMF. They must publish accurate data on a reliable schedule. They must be tamper-resistant. They must have documented incident response procedures. They must meet the security standards of the issuing institution.
Most major institutional TMMFs use Chainlink oracle infrastructure for NAV publication, proof of reserve attestation, cross-chain data messaging. Chainlink operates as a decentralized network with independent node operators providing the underlying infrastructure.
Matrixed.Link is an official Chainlink node operator. We run 500+ active price feeds across Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base. We operate Data Feeds, CRE, SVR, Proof of Reserve in production. We are ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified. SOC 2 Type II certification is currently in progress. We are the first Node Operator to build the first major RWA integration with over 100 million dollars in total value locked, which means our operational experience with institutional RWA products predates most of the current market.
Tokenization Platforms
Tokenization platforms provide the technology layer that turns traditional fund shares into blockchain tokens. Securitize is the dominant institutional platform, providing the technology behind BUIDL and many other major products. Tokeny, WisdomTree Prime, Polymath, other platforms serve adjacent segments.
Tokenization platforms typically handle smart contract deployment, investor onboarding, transfer agency integration, regulatory reporting. They are the layer between the traditional fund and the blockchain representation of its shares.
Node and RPC Infrastructure
TMMFs depend on reliable access to the blockchain networks they operate on. Retail-grade public RPC endpoints are usually insufficient for institutional operations. Most institutional products rely on dedicated nodes, managed node services from specialized operators, or enterprise node products deployed in the issuing institution’s own cloud environment.
The operational requirements include high availability, formal SLAs, institutional security certifications, integration with the institution’s monitoring and incident response processes.
Custody Integration
Institutional TMMF holders use qualified digital asset custodians. The custodians integrate with the TMMF smart contracts through standard blockchain interfaces, but the operational integration (reporting, reconciliation, workflow) typically requires custom work for each custodian-issuer pair.
The largest institutional custodians (BNY Mellon, State Street, Anchorage, Fireblocks, BitGo) have built integration capabilities for the major TMMF products. Newer products and smaller custodians may require additional integration work.
Compliance and Identity Infrastructure
TMMFs that serve regulated investors require identity verification and transfer restriction enforcement. Third-party identity providers handle KYC checks. On-chain identity attestation systems allow smart contracts to verify investor status before permitting transfers.
The identity layer is one of the more complex parts of the stack because it spans multiple jurisdictions, regulatory regimes, institutional preferences. Most institutional TMMFs work with specialized compliance technology partners rather than building identity infrastructure internally.
Cross-Chain Infrastructure
TMMFs increasingly deploy across multiple blockchain networks. Cross-chain infrastructure (bridges, messaging protocols like CCIP, multi-chain token standards) allows the same product to be accessible on Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, other networks without fragmenting the underlying fund.
Cross-chain operations introduce additional security considerations. Bridge security incidents have historically been one of the more common sources of large losses in crypto. Institutional products require bridge infrastructure with strong security properties, which is part of why Chainlink CCIP has become the standard for institutional cross-chain messaging.
5. Why TMMFs Are Growing So Fast
TMMFs crossed ten billion dollars in combined assets in under two years. Several factors explain the unusual pace of growth.
Solving a Real Problem
TMMFs deliver capital efficiency benefits that investors actually care about. Traditional money market funds settle on T+1. TMMFs settle in minutes. For treasury managers handling large cash balances, the difference is meaningful.
TMMFs also provide 24/7 availability. Traditional fund subscriptions and redemptions happen on business days during market hours. TMMFs are accessible any time. For global institutions operating across time zones, always-on access is operationally valuable.
Composability
TMMF tokens can be used as collateral in DeFi lending markets, in derivatives contracts, in other on-chain applications. This creates use cases that traditional money market funds cannot match. A crypto trading firm holding TMMFs can earn money market yield while using the tokens as collateral for leveraged positions.
Composability is also a growing consideration for institutional DeFi programs. The ability to plug yield-bearing collateral into on-chain strategies changes how institutions think about treasury deployment.
Yield Access for Crypto-Native Firms
Many crypto-native firms have difficulty establishing traditional banking relationships for idle capital. TMMFs give these firms access to Treasury yield through on-chain infrastructure they already use, without needing to open traditional brokerage accounts for each entity.
This demand pool was less visible to traditional finance observers. Once visible, it became one of the clearest product-market fits for TMMFs.
Regulatory Tailwinds
Regulatory clarity has improved materially for tokenized securities between 2024 and 2026. The SEC has granted specific exemptions for tokenized fund products (WisdomTree WTGXX). Regulators in Singapore, Hong Kong, the UAE, the EU have developed frameworks that accommodate tokenized fund structures.
Improved regulatory clarity does not guarantee adoption, but it removes blockers that previously kept institutional issuers on the sidelines.
Institutional FOMO
Once BlackRock launched BUIDL, other major asset managers began evaluating tokenization seriously. The competitive dynamic matters. Firms that do not participate in tokenized products risk ceding first-mover advantages to competitors. The dynamic has pulled the entire asset management industry into the category faster than the standalone product economics alone would have driven.
Infrastructure Maturation
The infrastructure supporting TMMFs has matured substantially. Oracle networks have production track records. Tokenization platforms have institutional-grade security. Custody providers have scaled. Smart contract standards have stabilized.
Two years ago, an institution launching a TMMF had to build or contract most of its infrastructure from scratch. Today, the infrastructure layer is largely available as vetted services. Launch timelines have shortened from years to months for institutions that want to move.
6. Risks and Regulatory Context
TMMFs carry risks that investors should understand. The regulatory framing is evolving but has reached a functional state in major jurisdictions.
Operational Risk
The infrastructure stack for a TMMF has multiple layers, each of which can fail. Oracle failures can delay NAV updates. Smart contract bugs can cause transfer failures. Bridge incidents can affect cross-chain availability. Custodian operational issues can affect the underlying assets.
Well-designed TMMFs manage these risks through redundancy, monitoring, formal operational procedures. Investors should understand the operational risk profile of any specific product before investing.
Regulatory Risk
TMMFs operate under securities regulations that are adapting to tokenized structures. The adaptation is uneven across jurisdictions. Rules that apply today may change. Cross-border distribution rules add additional complexity.
The risk is asymmetric. Clearer rules generally favor continued growth. Unexpected restrictive action, particularly in the US, could affect specific products or the category broadly.
Smart Contract Risk
Smart contracts can have bugs. Bugs in TMMF contracts could affect token transfers, yield distribution, or other functions. Well-designed products mitigate this through extensive auditing, formal verification of critical logic, bug bounty programs.
The track record for institutional-grade tokenized products has been strong. No major TMMF has suffered a catastrophic smart contract incident. This track record should not be assumed to continue indefinitely.
Bridge and Cross-Chain Risk
TMMFs that operate on multiple chains rely on cross-chain infrastructure. Bridges have historically been one of the more vulnerable parts of the blockchain infrastructure stack. Incidents on bridge protocols have caused large losses in other contexts.
Institutional products typically use Chainlink CCIP or other high-assurance cross-chain messaging protocols rather than retail-grade bridge solutions. The risk profile differs meaningfully from earlier bridge architectures.
Regulatory Framework Overview
In the United States, TMMFs fall under existing SEC and Investment Company Act frameworks. Individual products typically receive exemptive orders or rely on specific interpretations that permit the tokenization structure. The SEC has generally accommodated well-structured tokenized fund products.
In the European Union, MiCA provides a framework for crypto assets, while MiFID II covers tokenized securities. The interaction between the two frameworks affects how TMMFs can be distributed in EU jurisdictions.
Singapore (MAS), Hong Kong (SFC), UAE (VARA), other jurisdictions have developed their own frameworks. The specific rules vary but generally accommodate well-structured institutional tokenized products.
DORA and Operational Resilience
The EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act, effective since January 2025, creates specific operational resilience requirements for financial institutions and their critical third-party technology providers. TMMFs that serve EU investors fall within this framework, which affects how oracle infrastructure, tokenization platforms, other vendors must operate.
Similar operational resilience frameworks exist or are under development in the UK, Singapore, other jurisdictions.
7. How TMMFs Fit Into Institutional Treasury Management
For many institutional holders, TMMFs have become a meaningful part of treasury management. Understanding how they fit into treasury operations helps explain the demand.
Crypto-Native Firm Treasury Management
Crypto-native firms (protocols, exchanges, trading firms, DeFi protocols) hold large cash balances that need to earn yield. Traditional money market funds are operationally difficult for these firms: opening accounts is slow, moving funds between crypto and traditional banking has friction, the operational workflow does not fit how these firms operate.
TMMFs solve this by keeping treasury management on-chain. A crypto-native treasury can move from USDC to BUIDL to OUSG with the same operational workflow used for other on-chain assets. Yields accrue in the same system. Reporting integrates with the same tooling.
The demand pool for TMMFs from crypto-native treasury management has grown significantly between 2024 and 2026.
Institutional Crypto Allocator Treasury
Hedge funds, family offices, other allocators holding crypto assets at meaningful scale face similar issues. They want to earn yield on idle capital without the friction of traditional fund subscription processes.
For these allocators, TMMFs function as an improved cash-equivalent within their crypto strategy. The assets stay in the same custody and reporting infrastructure as their other crypto holdings, but earn Treasury-backed yield.
Traditional Institution Treasury Experimentation
Traditional institutions (asset managers, insurance companies, corporate treasuries) have begun experimenting with TMMFs as part of their broader digital asset exploration. These holdings are typically small relative to traditional cash management but provide the institution with operational familiarity with tokenized products.
The experimental use cases are important because they build internal institutional capability. A traditional asset manager that has operated small TMMF positions for a year is better prepared to launch its own tokenized products than one that has only studied the category.
Treasury as Collateral
An emerging use case is TMMF tokens functioning as collateral in institutional financing arrangements. Rather than posting cash or traditional securities as collateral, institutions can post TMMF tokens that earn yield while held as collateral.
This use case depends on counterparties accepting the tokens as collateral and on appropriate legal frameworks for collateral substitution. Development has been gradual but consistent.
8. The Future of Tokenized Money Market Funds
The trajectory of TMMFs over the next three to five years is shaped by several developments.
Continued Scale
Combined assets are likely to continue growing at the pace established between 2024 and 2026. Analyst projections vary, but the category reaching fifty to one hundred billion dollars in combined assets within two to three years is within range given current growth rates.
Product Diversification
Beyond Treasury-backed funds, the category is expanding into tokenized short-duration credit funds, tokenized corporate bond funds, tokenized structured products. Each new product category requires additional infrastructure work but follows the architectural pattern established by the first wave of TMMFs.
Institutional Custody Expansion
Major traditional custodians (State Street, BNY Mellon, JPMorgan, Citi) are expected to continue expanding their digital asset custody capabilities. As these capabilities reach parity with traditional custody, the custody layer becomes less of a distinguishing factor between TMMFs and traditional products.
Regulatory Normalization
Regulatory treatment of TMMFs is likely to continue normalizing. Individual exemptive orders that currently support specific products will be replaced by standardized frameworks. This reduces the cost and time to launch new tokenized products.
Infrastructure Consolidation
The infrastructure layer (oracles, tokenization platforms, custody providers, compliance services) is consolidating around providers that meet institutional procurement standards. Retail-grade providers will continue to serve retail-grade use cases. Institutional TMMFs will concentrate around providers with ISO 27001, SOC 2, relevant regulatory approvals.
Cross-Chain Standardization
Multi-chain deployment is becoming standard. Cross-chain messaging protocols like Chainlink CCIP are becoming the default rather than an enhancement. TMMF products designed after 2026 will typically be multi-chain from launch rather than single-chain with subsequent expansion.
Integration With Traditional Systems
Over the next three to five years, the integration between tokenized fund infrastructure and traditional fund infrastructure will deepen. Transfer agency systems, fund accounting platforms, custody systems will gain native support for tokenized shares. The operational gap between tokenized and traditional fund management will narrow.
When TMMFs Stop Being News
The clearest marker of category maturity will be when new TMMF launches stop being newsworthy. Today, each major institutional product launch generates press coverage because the category is still novel. In three to five years, a new tokenized money market fund will launch without coverage because it is one of dozens of similar products.
What is the largest tokenized money market fund?
BlackRock BUIDL is the largest tokenized money market fund by assets under management, with over 1.8 billion dollars in AUM as of early 2026. Franklin Templeton FOBXX is the earliest major tokenized money market fund from a traditional asset manager.
Can retail investors buy tokenized money market funds?
Most institutional TMMFs are currently restricted to qualified or accredited investors based on applicable securities regulations. Some products are available more broadly in specific jurisdictions. Access rules are enforced through smart contract compliance layers and off-chain KYC processes.
Are tokenized money market funds safe?
TMMFs carry risks including operational risk from the infrastructure layer, smart contract risk, regulatory risk, the same market risks as traditional money market funds (credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk). Well-designed institutional TMMFs manage these risks through redundant infrastructure, extensive auditing, regulatory compliance. As with any investment, investors should evaluate the specific product and their own risk tolerance.
How are TMMFs regulated?
TMMFs operate under the securities regulations that apply to traditional money market funds, adapted to accommodate tokenized share structures. In the US, this involves SEC oversight and typically requires specific exemptive orders or interpretations. Similar frameworks exist in the EU, UK, Singapore, Hong Kong, UAE, other jurisdictions.
What blockchain do most TMMFs use?
Ethereum is the most common blockchain for institutional TMMFs by total assets. Many products deploy across multiple networks, with expansions to Ethereum layer-2 networks (Arbitrum, Base, Optimism), Polygon, Avalanche, purpose-built institutional networks (Canton, Provenance).
What is the role of Chainlink in tokenized money market funds?
Chainlink oracle infrastructure supports multiple functions for TMMFs including net asset value publication, proof of reserve attestation, cross-chain messaging through CCIP. Major institutional TMMFs including BlackRock BUIDL use Chainlink oracle infrastructure. Chainlink operates as a decentralized network of independent node operators, of which Matrixed.Link is one.
What is Matrixed.Link’s role in tokenized money market funds?
Matrixed.Link is an official Chainlink node operator that runs oracle infrastructure used by tokenized asset programs in production. We were the first Node Operator to build the first major RWA integration with over 100 million dollars in total value locked. We run 500+ active Chainlink price feeds and operate Data Feeds, CRE, SVR, Proof of Reserve. Institutions launching or operating tokenized money market funds can work with us directly on oracle infrastructure, managed node operations, related consulting.
How do TMMFs pay yield?
TMMFs pay yield from the income generated by their underlying portfolios of Treasury bills, commercial paper, related instruments. Distribution mechanics vary by product. Some TMMFs distribute yield through daily token accruals that increase token value. Others distribute yield through periodic cash distributions to token holders. The underlying yield generation mechanism is the same as for traditional money market funds.
Can TMMF tokens be used as collateral?
Yes, increasingly. TMMF tokens can be used as collateral in DeFi lending protocols, derivatives contracts, institutional financing arrangements. Circle’s USYC is specifically positioned as yield-bearing collateral. The use case is growing as more counterparties develop frameworks for accepting tokenized assets as collateral.
About Matrixed.Link
Matrixed.Link is a specialized Web3 infrastructure provider and an official Chainlink node operator. We are the first Node Operator to build the first major RWA integration with over 100 million dollars in total value locked.
Our infrastructure runs 500+ active Chainlink price feeds across Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base. We operate Data Feeds, CRE, SVR, Proof of Reserve in production. We have pushed 12M+ data points on-chain through oracle operations. We validate proof-of-stake networks including Ethereum, Enjin, Polygon. Our Web3 API endpoints handle 2 billion daily requests.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified for Information Security Management Systems. SOC 2 Type II certification currently in progress.
For institutions operating or evaluating tokenized money market funds and related tokenized asset products, we provide specialized infrastructure operations, consulting on architecture and vendor selection, transition support from pilot to production, ongoing managed services under institutional SLAs.
Schedule a discovery call →
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, legal, or tax advice. Tokenized money market funds carry investment risk. Consult qualified advisors before making investment decisions.
Sources & References
Authoritative sources cited in this article and recommended for further reading:
- BlackRock, BUIDL Fund (institutional digital liquidity)
- Ondo Finance, Tokenized US Treasuries
- Franklin Templeton, OnChain US Government Money Fund (FOBXX)
- McKinsey & Company, Tokenization: A digital-asset déjà vu
- OECD, The Tokenisation of Assets and Potential Implications for Financial Markets
Work with Matrixed.Link
Matrixed.Link operates Chainlink oracle infrastructure, validator nodes, full-stack blockchain infrastructure for protocols and institutions that demand institutional-grade reliability. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified. AAA-rated by StakingRewards. Continuous operations since the Chainlink Oracle Olympics.
Long-term partnerships with Chainlink, Lido, Enjin, Stake.link, bitsCrunch.
Contact Matrixed.Link to discuss your infrastructure needs.
